Friday, November 27, 2009

Donnie Darko Critical Review

Hello All,

Thanks for stopping by and taking a minute to respond to my review of Donnie Darko. Please read through my review and afterward add your thoughts on the review as well as your own thoughts, connections, and ideas about the film. Thanks! (Don't forget to let me know who you are for Extra Credit)


The film Donnie Darko was all but a complete flop when released in theatres in the fall of 2001. Similar to films like Fight Club, Evil Dead, and variety of others, Donnie Darko reached a cult like following after its DVD release. What is it about the film Donnie Darko which was able to capture the attention of the general public? If one looks at the culture of the film; the blogs, wesbites, extra DVD features, it is all but too easy to see that the mystery and underlying meanings of the film is what keeps the viewer coming back for more and simply asking…what?

One of the most interesting aspects in analyzing Donnie Darko is in looking at its representations of good and evil. Throughout the film, many characters can be seen as both good and evil, and many fall in between or are very ambiguous. Donnie, the main character is throughout the film shown in both a positive and negative sense, and at times floating in the middle of the two. Similarly to the line of “Love and Fear” which Ms. Farmer puts up on the board, which Donnie states does not take into account the entire spectrum of human emotion. Donnie is seen at times as the evil doer (flooding the school, setting fire to Jim Cunningham’s house, and eventually killing Frank) or possibly the anti hero. He is fighting “crime” and the system he is in, but doesn’t come off as completely evil. He is the tainted hero. He falls somewhere on the line of “Love and Fear”, but does not completely meet the structuralist view of good or evil.

Another main character who also falls into this post-structuralist setting is the character Frank. Frank is represented throughout the film in two main forms. He is shown as the deceased Frank who is “helping” Donnie save the world. In other ways, Frank is also shown as a selfish character who is trying to save himself. Much like how Donnie is able to travel through time and carry-on in the tangent universe, Frank is able to carry on and attempt to alter the future and the past. Is this for his own survival? Is this for the sake of the real universe which will cease to exist if Donnie’s life is not ended? Does he want Donnie to continue to live so that Frank will always hold his powers of time travel and eternal life? Through these questions we can see Frank as both protagonist, antagonist, as well as somewhere in between.

Several other characters teeter between structuralism and post-structuralism within the film. The pedophile phony self help guru played by Patrick Swayze, Donnie’s psychologist, the female teacher played by Drew Barrymore, the male teacher played by Noah Wyle, Mrs. Farmer, and Donnie’s parents. This in addition to several events within the film which are contrasted against one another. This includes the flooding of the school by Donnie (a reference to the book The Destructors which is being read within the plot of the film) which results in him meeting Gretchen. The burning of Jim Cunningham’s house, eventually resulting in his Cunningham’s arrest for his involvement in child pornography is another contrasted set of events, and another prime example of Donnie as the pos-structuralist hero. (Donnie as the anti-hero/hero) Donnie Darko is a great example of a postmodern film while it leaves questions unanswered and provokes the viewer into making their own meanings from the film.

Semiotics and symbols also play a large role in the film, its multiple meanings, and fan interest and obsession. Attempting to decode this film is as mind boggling as putting together a several thousand piece puzzle. It is riddled with outside references to visual culture as well as literary and biblical innuendos. Throughout the film, Donnie is seen as an individual who is striving to decode his own future. Being guided by Frank, he understands certain elements of his future, and begins to decode and learn about the idea of time travel. While time travel within this film may be fairly straightforward as a concept, it is Donnie’s ability to decide upon his route of travel which links this film to biblical thought. Later in the film Donnie makes a decision to travel back in time and allow the non-tangent universe to continue. He learns that if he does not die, only Frank and himself will remain, and all others will cease to exist. Donnie chooses to die and allow others to remain alive; Donnie acts as a savior. Much like the Matrix films, Donnie Darko utilizes this biblical reference as it compares Donnie himself to Jesus dying for the sins of others. An additional reference which is seen in the film The Matrix is that of a rabbit. The Matrix utilizes the “white rabbit” as a guide for Neo within this film. In Donnie Darko, a not so white rabbit is also utilized to go “deeper into the rabbit hole” as Frank acts as Donnie’s guide. Furthermore, the battle between Mrs. Pomerory (Drew Barrymore) and the school board for freedom to read The Destructors is a clear representation of good and evil, with evil eventually triumphing with the firing of Ms. Pomeroy. Other characters and events which hold symbolic meaning include Cherita Chen (an angel through representation and in the school play), Mrs. Sparrow/Grandma Death and Donnie’s psychologist as his spiritual guides. The flooding of the school as a potential cleansing or awakening similar to baptism.

The film offers dense symbols and ideas which can and have been read in many ways. Through a simple search of the internet, one can find a great deal of both revere and criticism for the film. A great deal of the film focuses on the idea of time travel, while it isn’t explained in great detail, it does offer up another realm of interest and criticism from the public. Some have developed their own theories and ideas from the film, while other insist the film is not about time travel at all, but a puzzle of symbols and hidden meanings. Even the director, Richard Kelly, who states his intention and idea of the film in the directors extended commentary reveals that the film is open to interpretation and that there is no one meaning. This idea is what has kept fans and critics drawn to the film Donnie Darko, and what continues to drive it cult fandom and interpretation.

6 comments:

  1. Donnie Darko is a very interesting movie. It is also a movie you definitely have to watch more than once. There's two movies. There's the Original Cut, and then there's the Director's Cut. A reason I believe this movie wasn't as popular back in 2001 is because it made you think. People don't want to watch a movie where they have to think. When watching the Director's Cut more things are answered than in the Original Cut. You don't have to think as much.

    Every character or thing plays a part in the movie. The jet engine that falls into Donnie's room is the artifact. It is basically the reason the tangent universe is there. Donnie is the Living Receiver. His mission is to return the artifact back to the primary universe. Frank is the Manipulated Dead and can contact Donnie. He is there to help him on his mission. Everyone else in the movie is the Manipulated. When the artifact is returned to the primary universe the tangent universe will reset. All the Manipulated will have a feeling of what had happened, but will see it as a dream. Most of them do not remember what happened. If they do remember, they will be filled with great sadness.

    A main character which wasn't mentioned much in this review is Roberta Sparrow. She's not in the film much, but she does play a big part. She's probably one of the only people that really helped Donnie. He was helped a lot by her character, and what she had done in her life helped him find answers. She wrote the book Philosophy of Time Travel. By the end of the movie Donnie believes she knows about Frank and goes to her house for answers.

    Spending some time on the official Donnie Darko website also give you more information on what happened after the end of the movie, and even more information about the movie itself.
    DonnieDarkoFilm.com

    I recommend watching the Original Cut first. If you like the movie, then I would recommend the Director's Cut. Both are great films.

    -Ashley Marcinkiewicz

    ReplyDelete
  2. Donnie Darko put me through two of the most confusing hours of my life. Seeing it for the first time, I sat there just enjoying the visuals because the plot made absolutely no sense. After watching it again I started to understand it more, but not nearly enough.

    This review really helped explain a lot of things I didn't understand about the movie. I knew that Donnie was able to make the choice to live or die at the end of the movie, but it wasn't completely clear to me that everyone else wouldn't exist if he decided to live. Explaining the symbols and connections to other works helps with understanding too.

    I haven't seen the movie in some time but if I were to watch it now I would understand it a lot more and try to interpret the film in my own way instead of trying to focus on one meaning.

    Brendan Carey

    ReplyDelete
  3. I spent a couple months of m life obsessing over this movie. The time travel part was the most interesting thing to me. It seemed to be as if it was completely irrelevant, due to the complete lack of sense any of the time traveling parts make. They are more so symbolic to what is going on in the current plot of the movie. Such as The airplane being sucked in to the black-hole type thing closer to the end of the movie. It is resembling Donnie's choice of self sacrifice, and not trying to make commentary on time travel.

    Although my idea could be completely wrong, as to what the Producer was trying to achieve. It could be a whole movie devoted to the exploration of time travel. It is all up to interpretation. I enjoyed reading your review.
    -Mason Anderson

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like Donnie Darko because I think that the movie was designed to keep people thinking like you said. So many parts are left open for interpretation and everyone interprets parts differently. For example, I would have never though of the school flooding as a symbol of cleansing or baptism.
    My favorite part/theme of the movie is all the references to the future. The readings from the time travel book and the black hole. I think this movie was put together very well, i haven't had a chance to see it in a while and it is definitely a movie that you was to watch over and over again.

    -Maggie Kaczor

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think your perspective on good vs evil brings light to certain character traits people often do not pay attention to the first or second time they are viewing Donny Darko. I myself have watched this film several different times. Each time I end with new theories on what concepts and messages are being communicated not only by the characters in the movie but by the director and his choice in imagery and details. Details like, Donny stabbing at Frank’s eye through the liquid shield while he is looking in the mirror at Frank. He does this before we learn about Frank’s character being stabbed in the eye later on in the film.

    I think we as a viewer are subconsciously aware of these details when we are watching and processing them, yet I think these are subtle details that keeps us wanting to watch it again and again to try and figure out why, at that moment in the film, we were so engaged and interested in what is happening between the characters.

    There is also a great deal of unconventional camera angels and scene placement with the combination of music and image that draws in the viewer as well. This provides the opportunity for outside the box ways of explaining some of the interactions we take for granted in everyday communication.

    I think you have good insight as to what certain elements each of these characters are battling together and individually through out the movie. However I think that the movie takes good vs. evil and weaves a intricate net leading to the possibility that chaos has order. I think the story line opens our eyes to the complexity and intimacy we share with each other each day. By simply paying attention and becoming aware of the conversations and interactions held between each other, one can try to understand concepts of time, synchronicity and the possibility that simplicity can create a sort of chaos. Overall I think this films story and director’s vision makes you question and believe in the beauty of chaos.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just saw this movie for the first time. It's now after 1 am and I can't sleep cause everytime i shut my eyes, my thoughts go to it.
    It's such a confusing movie potraying many things.
    It shows teenage angst and self sacrifice.If ever in the movie things start to make sence and fall into place, its the last 10minutes or so. When Donnie Sacrificed himself, he was the protaganist even though many of the acts he had commited went the other way. Like you said, there are many interpretations of this movie, one might even say it's about peer pressure. Peer pressure because the big bunny "made him do it".

    Comments time travelin interpretation: I've only watched the movie once. I didn't catch the time traveling bit till the end where it all sorta started at the beggining with an alternate course of events.

    I can't use big words or cool phrases to talk about this movie. I think i might have to watch it again.
    -Elnaz Douzali

    ReplyDelete